Escape Artists

News:

News

ATTENTION: NEW FORUM THEME Please see here for details: http://forum.escapeartists.net/index.php?topic=13188.0

Author Topic: fantasy women  (Read 44670 times)

deflective

  • Hipparch
  • ******
  • Posts: 1171
on: April 16, 2008, 06:50:38 PM
this started in the run of the fiery horse thread.

Rachel is known for going well out of her way on the topics of gender equality and women's rights. Her personal views should not color my enjoyment of a piece nor my view of the podcast.

If the editors don't run good fiction ... then we can all vote with our dollars and our downloads. Until then I think we should let Podcastle take its own course and keep our speculations relevant to the stories at hand.

i didn't know that Rachel defined herself as a feminist when i posted. it feels like this has been reinterpreted as a personal attack on the editor and that was never my intent.

i disagree that the only feedback we should give is to stop listening to the show (probably isn't what you meant but it's what was said). podcasting is built around two-way media. feedback early, feedback often. i assume that every one of my posts comes with the caveat that it's just opinion and i'm posting to share it.

Any time you've got a woman overcoming obstacles, it's going to read, from a certain angle, as explicitly feminist.

Terry Pratchett's Granny Weatherwax may have first appeared in equal rites, but soon after that she would have quickly sorted out anyone (man or woman) that tried to define her in terms of a feminist agenda.

By the by, I crunched some numbers last night, and looking at what we have in stock, we have, depending on what slice of stories you look at (scheduled or not, etc) somewhere between 43 and 55% stories written by and narrated men (oddly, the numbers for narration and writing are dead even, even though we have plenty of men writing as women, and women writing as men, and so on). As a point of contrast, Steve says last time he crunched numbers, only 30% of Escape Pod stories were written by women, and Ann tells me that only two of his last sixteen pieces had female narrators.

I do appreciate the compliments in the thread, and that these critiques are offered in a spirit of helpfulness and desire to see PodCastle rockin'.

i want to repeat that this was about the content of the stories and not the gender of the people. there seems to be a popular mindset that minority issues are a matter of equalizing numbers (don't know how women wound up defined as a minority) but this is just a limit of enforceable law. most teenagers could handle alcohol just fine and there are adults that should never be allowed to drink but a drinking age is the best we can do from a legal standpoint. all the stories have been good, it's just the overall trend (especially when the other podcasts are included) that has put me off.

it's never easy to offer unpopular criticism but it's important to know that an editor can take it in the spirit it has been given. things are off to a good start, i look forward to see what happens next.



Rachel Swirsky

  • Hipparch
  • ******
  • Posts: 1233
    • PodCastle
Reply #1 on: April 16, 2008, 07:21:06 PM
I'll reply here once, and then probably not again. I appreciate your attempt at engagement, deflective, but I think mostly I've said what I have to say. :-D

Quote
soon after that she would have quickly sorted out anyone (man or woman) that tried to define her in terms of a feminist agenda.

The definition of feminist is tricky. However, I would say that I believe women have historically been disadvantaged (see also: our only recent right to vote) and continue to be disadvantaged in modern society, and world-wide (see also: wage gap persistence even after statistical fiddling, the fact that both men and women rate the same speech higher in terms of its intelligence if it's delivered by a man than by a woman, the repeatable studies showing that orchestra auditions conducted behind a curtain result in hiring more women than when the people are visible, and so on). I believe these things suck, and am a proponent of women's equal social and legal rights in society.

I'm not really up for arguing that stuff here, but you can use that as a working definition of feminist when dealing with me, if you like.

Quote
I don't know how women wound up defined as a minority


The definition is sociological, not numerical. Minority in terms of power, etc.

Quote
it's just the overall trend (especially when the other podcasts are included) that has put me off.

Yeah, that was totally coincidental. The editors do not consult on the material that's going into the podcasts, except inasmuch as I talk to Steve about what I'm doing 'cuz I'm new. I think it's truly unfortunate -- though coincidental -- that my story "Heartstrung" aired near the beginning of PodCastle. That's in no way Ben's fault; I don't think the unfortunate coincidence would have been predictable beforehand.

I wrote the story when I was 21. It was something I felt deeply at the time. It is not the story I would write now. I try not to respond to criticism, as I think most authors should avoid doing. I will, however, say this about the piece: I am deeply touched by the people who have emailed me to say it touched them, and the editors like Ben Phillips and Andy Cox and Jetse deVries and Rich Horton who have deemed this story worth running -- all men, I note.

Nevertheless, at this point five years later, the story feels like it was written by someone else. As I said, it's not the story I would write now. I think the story is interesting, but it's certainly not comprehensive--it's like a piece of a painting, perhaps, what I believe art critics call a detail. A certain vivid but partial image, like part of a dream.

OK, I'm out of the conversation now (and again can be reached by PM). Have at. ;-)



DKT

  • Friendly Neighborhood
  • Hipparch
  • ******
  • Posts: 4980
  • PodCastle is my Co-Pilot
    • Psalms & Hymns & Spiritual Noir
Reply #2 on: April 16, 2008, 08:16:33 PM

I wrote the story when I was 21.


You wrote that when you were 21?  Geez, I think I just might hate you in the best way possible.   ;)


deflective

  • Hipparch
  • ******
  • Posts: 1171
Reply #3 on: April 17, 2008, 01:09:50 AM
Quote from: Rachel Swirsky
I appreciate your attempt at engagement, deflective, but I think mostly I've said what I have to say. :-D

aye, you've made yourself very accessible. =) thanks for the prompt replies.

this thread may help to keep story threads on topic, i'll probably be back to it if the upcoming batch of stories continue in the same vein.

Quote
The definition of feminist is tricky. However, I would say that I believe women have historically been disadvantaged ... and continue to be disadvantaged ... these things suck, and am a proponent of women's equal social and legal rights in society.

defining feminism is tricky, like any politically loaded term (atheism, middle class & global warming cause problems). everyone assumes they know what it means and everyone's definition is slightly different. debate goes on for pages before anyone takes a breath and realizes they're talking about entirely different things.

i've never actually sat down and thought about it before but i break feminism into two broad camps, both which seek social & legal rights. debatably they both seek equality but one does it explicitly while the other grabs any & all available power with the argument that the deck is stacked heavily against them so any reverse-discrimination is reparation.

one is inclusive, the other combative. they're both important and serve their purposes but i react badly to the second like i do any group with an us/them mentality.


Quote
I wrote the story when I was 21. It was something I felt deeply at the time. It is not the story I would write now....

i sometimes feel like this looking at something i wrote a month ago =)

Quote
I think the story is interesting, but it's certainly not comprehensive--it's like a piece of a painting, perhaps, what I believe art critics call a detail. A certain vivid but partial image, like part of a dream.

and what more could we realisticaly want from a short story? horror in particular, classic pseudopod.



hautdesert

  • Editor
  • *****
  • Posts: 315
Reply #4 on: April 17, 2008, 12:36:02 PM
Quote
i disagree that the only feedback we should give is to stop listening to the show (probably isn't what you meant but it's what was said). podcasting is built around two-way media. feedback early, feedback often. i assume that every one of my posts comes with the caveat that it's just opinion and i'm posting to share it.

I completely agree--I think the strength of things like this message board is that it allows two-way discussion.  Editors, narrators, and authors get to hear what the audience thinks, and can answer questions if they want.  Everybody learns things, so it's all good.

Rachel's already said some of this, but I'll echo it anyway.  There's some frustration--not directed at any particular commenter--in hearing the "what's with all the girl power?" thing.  Deflective, I think your post wasn't offensive at all, I want to be clear about that, and as I said above, one of the things I really value about the board is the way listeners can react and comment and question things.

The frustration isn't neccessarily from feeling personally attacked.  It comes from a larger situation.  A commenter on the blog put it really well, I thought.

Quote
It’s commonplace for podcasts to be organized by male editors, with stories by male writers, about male protagonists, and read by male readers. It’s not uncommon for there to be several such episodes in a row.

There’s nothing wrong with male writers, editors, readers, or protagonists, of course.

What is problematic is the double-standard. That the large majority of published stories are by men, published by men, and about men is something we’re used to; it’s invisible, like water for seahorses. But even one or two podcasts that involve multiple female creators will be objected to,

So any frustration isn't with you, Deflective, or with anyone else in particular.  It's the thing the commenter mentioned above--a long string of guy stories is normal, unremarkable.  A short string of girl stories gets very different attention.

There was research done--and if I could dig it up, I'd link to specifics--showing that, in a room divided fifty-fifty between men and women, a person (male or female) asked to describe the people in the room said it was mostly women.  A room with, say, two women and ten men was described as being fifty-fifty.  Part of the same double standard.  It's something I see in my daily life all the time, and it's very frustrating to me.

Anyway.  I do hope that commenters feel free to express their opinion of any story regardless of whether they think an editor (associate editor, in my case--I don't pick any stories, I just read slush and give the Chief Editor my thoughts on what I've read) or moderator approves of that opinion.

I also think a thread discussing women in fantasy is a very good idea.

If it's true--I honestly don't know if it actually is--that more women write and read fantasy than science fiction, and read it as well, then it may well be that the percentage of female-led and "girl power" type stories is going to be higher in the genre (as already noted in the other thread, I forget who said it).  And it might be interesting to consider what the roles are of the various main characters in some of the stories upcoming are.  It could be a really cool discussion.



deflective

  • Hipparch
  • ******
  • Posts: 1171
Reply #5 on: April 17, 2008, 07:10:56 PM
Quote from: hautdesert
There's some frustration--not directed at any particular commenter--in hearing the "what's with all the girl power?" thing. ... The frustration isn't neccessarily from feeling personally attacked.  It comes from a larger situation.  A commenter on the blog put it really well, I thought.
Quote
...the large majority of published stories are by men, published by men, and about men is something we’re used to; it’s invisible, like water for seahorses. But even one or two podcasts that involve multiple female creators will be objected to,
...a long string of guy stories is normal, unremarkable.  A short string of girl stories gets very different attention.

i forgot about the blog, guess you really have been getting this from all sides.

you may have meant your post to be a general reply to all these comments but, for the fourth time, i'm not talking about gender. it's the content of the stories.

since it keeps coming back to numbers, lets talk numbers. over the past three weeks, since podcastle began, six of the nine podshows have centered on woman (behind the rules, heartstrung, living in sepia, and all of podcastle). this is close to a month with well over 50% female content, fair enough. with all the attention the numbers get it's important to people.

but, speaking for myself, the problem is that five of those six (all but come lady death) center on a protagonist struggling against oppression, specifically male oppression. now we've got a month where over half of the stories include the same theme and that quickly becomes stale. add that pseudopod had two more stories last month (the little match girl and the language of crows) and now you get people commenting.

from this perspective it isn't just a podcastle issue, it's a growing trend in pseudopod that coincided with podcastle's launch. you probably caught flack because of that.

Quote
...it might be interesting to consider what the roles are of the various main characters in some of the stories upcoming are.

the breakdown serves to highlight the issue, so far we're looking at close to 90% of female stories relying on the victim of oppression/demonization theme. a large part of that comes from the nature of psuedopod's stories though.


it's still way too early to be breaking down numbers. this really isn't meant to prove anything, just put my point of view into the language that's currently being used.



Heradel

  • Bill Peters, EP Assistant
  • Hipparch
  • ******
  • Posts: 2938
  • Part-Time Psychopomp.
Reply #6 on: April 17, 2008, 07:47:35 PM
<snip>
since it keeps coming back to numbers, lets talk numbers. over the past three weeks, since podcastle began, six of the nine podshows have centered on woman (behind the rules, heartstrung, living in sepia, and all of podcastle). this is close to a month with well over 50% female content, fair enough. with all the attention the numbers get it's important to people.

but, speaking for myself, the problem is that five of those six (all but come lady death) center on a protagonist struggling against oppression, specifically male oppression. now we've got a month where over half of the stories include the same theme and that quickly becomes stale. add that pseudopod had two more stories last month (the little match girl and the language of crows) and now you get people commenting.
<snip>

Well, person v. society tends to be a pretty common theme in literature, and the world we live in, while it's getting better, still has more men in positions of power than women. And especially with fantasy, which often takes place in the past, the power structures were/are normally male-centered.

I wouldn't put anything to purpose which can be explained by coincidence, and this seems like coincidence. There have been other microtrends, I'm sure this one's just random chance and will end. There will be male narrators on the stories, and male main characters — I've seen the numbers. But we've also had many stories in the EP/PP/PC verse that's man vs. society(male), so I wouldn't call it an overall trend when we look at the history.  I certainly remember people being annoyed when EP went a month or two without some space opera, so I'd liken this to that.

There's a good discussion to be had about these themes in the story threads, and independent of the stories. People might also be taking things a bit further than the authors meant. I saw PC002 as feminist, but I didn't think that the church patriarchy was made up of males because the author wanted to say something about men — Most churches are mostly male in the clergy. Personally, I was wondering how they dealt with the male/female ratio being out of whack because of the culling of females in the small community.

Quote from: deflective
the breakdown serves to highlight the issue, so far we're looking at close to 90% of female stories relying on the victim of oppression/demonization theme. a large part of that comes from the nature of psuedopod's stories though.


It's rarer to see male protagonists with those themes, but they do exist. Escape Pod just ran one. I'd argue that it's more that the slush piles have more stories coming in with female protagonists being oppressed than with males protagonists being oppressed (but I don't have access to the slush, so I don't know). Which isn't necessarily a good thing, but I'd point my finger at society on that before the editors. And I'd hazard a guess that most of these stories would still work if you switched genders, but I didn't write them so I can't really say.

Anyway, this is my two cents. I just think it's a more interesting conversation to talk about the themes and how society brings them up rather than how they've expressed numerically in EP/PP/PC. They're interesting themes to bring up, and they get brought up often. I don't see an editorial viewpoint, just a bit of coincidence.

I Twitter. I also occasionally blog on the Escape Pod blog, which if you're here you shouldn't have much trouble finding.


Tango Alpha Delta

  • Hipparch
  • ******
  • Posts: 1778
    • Tad's Happy Funtime
Reply #7 on: April 19, 2008, 03:24:38 PM

Quote
It’s commonplace for podcasts to be organized by male editors, with stories by male writers, about male protagonists, and read by male readers. It’s not uncommon for there to be several such episodes in a row.

There’s nothing wrong with male writers, editors, readers, or protagonists, of course.

What is problematic is the double-standard. That the large majority of published stories are by men, published by men, and about men is something we’re used to; it’s invisible, like water for seahorses. But even one or two podcasts that involve multiple female creators will be objected to,

So any frustration isn't with you, Deflective, or with anyone else in particular.  It's the thing the commenter mentioned above--a long string of guy stories is normal, unremarkable.  A short string of girl stories gets very different attention.


In other words:


This Wiki Won't Wrangle Itself!

I finally published my book - Tad's Happy Funtime is on Amazon!


hautdesert

  • Editor
  • *****
  • Posts: 315
Reply #8 on: April 19, 2008, 03:44:36 PM
Yes, TAD, exactly.

More or less, what Heradel said.  I'd also like to point out that the perception that any story with a heroic female MC vs society must be "women triumphing over male oppressors" is related to the numbers issue.  And also related to the idea of male heros as being "default" and unremarkable.  Just one female hero is enough to make a certain percentage of readers say, "hey, she must be female because the author wants her to triumph over male oppression!" because the assumption is that a main char is going to be male, unless there's a specific reason to make them something else. 

It's part of a systematic set of assumptions.  It doesn't make the people who make those assumptions bad people, or stupid, or whatever else.  But it's good to question them.  Maybe in the end a given person would make conclusions that differ from mine, but it's worth examining.



deflective

  • Hipparch
  • ******
  • Posts: 1171
Reply #9 on: April 20, 2008, 05:58:34 AM
I wouldn't put anything to purpose which can be explained by coincidence, and this seems like coincidence.
...
I'd point my finger at society on that before the editors.
...
I don't see an editorial viewpoint, just a bit of coincidence.

nobody ever suggested that any of this is was on purpose.

since i've started posting my position it has been constantly, wrongly, reinterpreted to be (1) i think there are too many females in my podshows (instead of an overused theme) and (2) i blame the editors for this (instead of mentioning so that they know that listeners are starting to notice). having to constantly refute strawmen distracts from interesting debate.

in any politically charged debate it's easy to dismiss the people that you disagree with if you interpret everything they say as stereotypical hardline argument.

It doesn't make the people who make those assumptions bad people, or stupid, or whatever else.  But it's good to question them.

indeed. i've seen the value of having determined dissenters on the political boards of 2003-2004. i'm self-appointed jester in this issue, without the funny.


Quote from: hautdesert
I'd also like to point out that the perception that any story with a heroic female MC vs society must be "women triumphing over male oppressors" is related to the numbers issue.

interesting, my number wasn't 100%. care to give your interpretation of which stories employ the theme?

Quote from: hautdesert
...the assumption is that a main char is going to be male, unless there's a specific reason to make them something else.
Quote from: Heradel
It's rarer to see male protagonists with those themes, but they do exist.

here's something worth talking about. how often do short story authors employ female main characters and why?

from the stories we've been hearing it's usually used as a quick way to create conflict. this isn't true in stories considered higher literature but in these stories it's noticeable.

understandable? sure. short stories have limited space and shortcuts let you quickly build the scene. desirable? not so much. relying on a known meme quickly relates information but it also reinforces the stereotype. there's a line somewhere between ignoring an issue and fixating on it, a line that's in different places for different people.


Quote from: Heradel
PC002 ... I was wondering how they dealt with the male/female ratio being out of whack because of the culling of females in the small community.

it was one sacrifice over a year over a nation. =) i'm sure some guy somewhere was willing to spend his time playing WoW to even it out.



Rachel Swirsky

  • Hipparch
  • ******
  • Posts: 1233
    • PodCastle
Reply #10 on: April 20, 2008, 06:02:07 AM
Quote
(1) i think there are too many females in my podshows (instead of an overused theme)

If you check out the blog, people have suggested this is on purpose, and that the problem is the presence of too many women in the podcast -- not just as characters, but as narrators, hosts, and editors.

A quote: "This cast has also started off with (IMO) an unfortunate “by-women-for-women” overtone."



deflective

  • Hipparch
  • ******
  • Posts: 1171
Reply #11 on: April 20, 2008, 07:04:30 AM
fair enough. i do consider that comment out of line.
i've been very careful to qualify my position previously, repetition is taking its toll.



Tango Alpha Delta

  • Hipparch
  • ******
  • Posts: 1778
    • Tad's Happy Funtime
Reply #12 on: April 20, 2008, 12:47:06 PM
fair enough. i do consider that comment out of line.
i've been very careful to qualify my position previously, repetition is taking its toll.

Just so you don't feel so... oppressed... you aren't the first male to find yourself in this weird "I'm arguing against people with whom I basically agree" situation.  See the Gender & Identity in Online Culture thread if you want to see several of us sticking our limbs into the same tarbaby.  :)

Do enjoy yourself... we'll probably still be here when you get through all of it!

This Wiki Won't Wrangle Itself!

I finally published my book - Tad's Happy Funtime is on Amazon!


Thaurismunths

  • High Priest of TCoRN
  • Hipparch
  • ******
  • Posts: 1421
  • Praise N-sh, for it is right and good!
Reply #13 on: April 20, 2008, 01:23:01 PM
Quote from: hautdesert
...the assumption is that a main char is going to be male, unless there's a specific reason to make them something else.
Quote from: Heradel
It's rarer to see male protagonists with those themes, but they do exist.
here's something worth talking about. how often do short story authors employ female main characters and why?

In genera wide? I can't say. I've only read so much fiction and can listen to so many podcasts. I would say that an overwhelming number of the characters I've read about are male, but I've also focused on reading the classics. As for audio, I'm guessing it's closer to 50/50 or 40/30/30 men to women to neutral (male and female leads, or characters that aren't either). I think the podcasting story market is much more evenly balanced.

Quote
Quote from: Heradel
PC002 ... I was wondering how they dealt with the male/female ratio being out of whack because of the culling of females in the small community.

it was one sacrifice over a year over a nation. =) i'm sure some guy somewhere was willing to spend his time playing WoW to even it out.
That's hilarious. :)

How do you fight a bully that can un-make history?


hautdesert

  • Editor
  • *****
  • Posts: 315
Reply #14 on: April 20, 2008, 02:33:25 PM


Quote from: hautdesert
I'd also like to point out that the perception that any story with a heroic female MC vs society must be "women triumphing over male oppressors" is related to the numbers issue.

interesting, my number wasn't 100%. care to give your interpretation of which stories employ the theme?


Actually, in the Fiery Horse thread, you said,

Quote
but there's one thing about podcastle that's beginning to bug me, all three stories have had a heavy theme of female empowerment

Later you revised that, saying that no, Come Lady Death hadn't had that theme.  But consider your first reaction.  At first blush, you classed all three stories together as "female empowerment" stories.  Why?

Later, in this thread, you said,

Quote
speaking for myself, the problem is that five of those six (all but come lady death) center on a protagonist struggling against oppression, specifically male oppression

For Fear of Dragons does not feature a protagonist struggling against specifically male oppression.  You could make the priesthood female and the society a matriarchy and not change the story in any fundamental way.  You could make Jeanette a boy, and leave the priests male, and not change the story except for the need to find some sort of virginity test.

The protagonist of For Fear of Dragons is female because of the template she was working from--the maiden given to a dragon as payment/appeasement/sacrifice.  Her gender is what it is because it's traditional, not because it's a story of female empowerment.

Now, Firey Horse is a bit trickier.  But we have the words of the author--she'd heard about how the horoscopes of little girls affected their futures (or lack of it) in this particular society.  She wondered about those little girls.  She sat down and constructed a story out of the elements she found.

Now, in this case you can't change the genders quite as easily.  Boys didn't get their feet bound in China. No one was worried if their son was a Fire Horse.  You can't just change the protagonist to male and have the same story.  It's clear that the gender of the protagonist is essential if the author wants to stay in China in that period and ponder Fire Horse girls.

Is the essential conflict of the story one of a woman triumphing over male oppression?  Personally, I don't think so.  It's part of a whole flock of "outsmarting the devil" stories, of which "The Devil and Daniel Webster" is one of the more famous.  The antagonist isn't The Patriarchy, or Male Oppression, it's the demon/devil with which she makes the deal.

In fact, she receives a lot of assistance from her father.  Her father has not oppressed her at all.  He refused to expose her when she was born.  That fact, and his character later, makes one wonder just how encouraging Tsi Cha had to be, to convince him not to bind her feet.  It's her father who assists her in overcoming her adversary.

Yes, she's brave and smart and overcomes--but what she's overcoming isn't "male oppression" unless you assume that any heroine triumphing against a male adversary is "female empowerment."

And assuming that, as I see it, is part of that "numbers" illusion I was talking about earlier.

Quote

Quote from: hautdesert
...the assumption is that a main char is going to be male, unless there's a specific reason to make them something else.
Quote from: Heradel
It's rarer to see male protagonists with those themes, but they do exist.

here's something worth talking about. how often do short story authors employ female main characters and why?

from the stories we've been hearing it's usually used as a quick way to create conflict. this isn't true in stories considered higher literature but in these stories it's noticeable.


Why do you assume that these stories choose female protagonists as a quick way to create conflict?  I'm speaking here of the Podcastle stories.

For Fear of Dragons seems to me to have chosen a female protagonist out of convention.  Fiery Horse, because it was the idea of all those baby girls who died during Fire Horse years that intrigued the author, according to the author's own testimony.

In neither case was there a desire to shorthand conflict.  And in any event, just putting a female character in the lead does not automatically create conflict.  Not unless you assume that any female protagonist must of neccesity be strugging against The Patriarchy.  Which I find an odd assumption.

I don't know the numbers of female main chars in fantasy.  I do know that as a writer, I choose the genders of characters because they seem right to me, for whatever reason.  Sometimes I pick a female lead just because all those years when I was a kid reading fantasy and sf I wished I had a few more stories with female leads.  Sometimes I pick whichever gender would be conventional, because frankly it's easier and I had other things I wanted to play with.  Once, pondering a type of story that would normally have a female lead, I put a male lead in.  The results were very interesting, to me at any rate.

Not once have I chosen the gender of a main character because it would shortcut creating conflict with male oppression.  And none of the writers I've spoken to have, either.  This includes writers I talk to who I know are explicitly feminist or political in their writing.



deflective

  • Hipparch
  • ******
  • Posts: 1171
Reply #15 on: April 20, 2008, 08:33:25 PM
... you aren't the first male to find yourself in this weird "I'm arguing against people with whom I basically agree" situation. See the Gender & Identity in Online Culture thread ...

our disagreement is subtler than most gender debates but it's still an important distinction. good to know about the other thread, i'll definitely take a look to see where people are coming from.

As for audio, I'm guessing it's closer to 50/50 or 40/30/30 men to women to neutral (male and female leads, or characters that aren't either). I think the podcasting story market is much more evenly balanced.

that surprises me. i'll start paying more attention to how often stories leaves gender unassigned.

Later you revised that, saying that no, Come Lady Death hadn't had that theme.  But consider your first reaction.  At first blush, you classed all three stories together as "female empowerment" stories.  Why?

i specifically answered that:
you're right to point out that come lady death doesn't really belong in the trend. it probably felt that way because it came out the same week that the other podcasts had their stories and a large part of the episode's discussion concentrates on death's sex.

podcastle was the flash point for a larger trend across all three podshows.

Quote from: hautdesert
For Fear of Dragons does not feature a protagonist struggling against specifically male oppression.  You could make the priesthood female and the society a matriarchy and not change the story in any fundamental way.  You could make Jeanette a boy, and leave the priests male, and not change the story except for the need to find some sort of virginity test.

The protagonist of For Fear of Dragons is female because of the template she was working from--the maiden given to a dragon as payment/appeasement/sacrifice.  Her gender is what it is because it's traditional, not because it's a story of female empowerment.

it takes a lot of tap dancing to try to make your case in a story that spends its first half sacrificing specifically females and the last half demonizing specifically females while every character doing it is male.

you appear to be saying that the story doesn't contain male oppression because it could have been rewritten so that it doesn't contain male oppression. some part of me applauds this bit of Orwellian mental gymnastics.

Quote from: hautdesert
For Fear of Dragons seems to me to have chosen a female protagonist out of convention.

this is, in fact, my point exactly. the theme of male oppression isn't necessary for the story but it's included anyway because it's low hanging fruit, a quick way for the author to set the scene. all you need to do is mention dragon sacrifice or witch burning and everyone immediately has an image in mind. in general this is fine but when it's used excessively, especially across multiple stories, it begins to reinforce the stereotypes it invokes. in this case, the stereotype of woman as victim.

Quote from: hautdesert
Now, Firey Horse is a bit trickier.
...
what she's overcoming isn't "male oppression" unless you assume that any heroine triumphing against a male adversary is "female empowerment."

i would argue that since his attention in her becomes sexual and she specifically uses her sex against him it does become a male / female issue.

Quote from: hautdesert
Quote from: deflective
how often do short story authors employ female main characters and why?
from the stories we've been hearing it's usually used as a quick way to create conflict.
Why do you assume that these stories choose female protagonists as a quick way to create conflict?
...
Sometimes I pick whichever gender would be conventional, because frankly it's easier and I had other things I wanted to play with.
...
Not once have I chosen the gender of a main character because it would shortcut creating conflict with male oppression.

there's a subtle difference between our topics, i didn't use the word choose. sexism doesn't have to be a conscious decision, a point struck upon repeatedly in discussion about wage disparity and other feminist issues. in fact, this ingrained mindset usually isn't even visible to the parties involved.

i've said which stories i think are using male oppression and why. you've said that you think the theme doesn't appear at all in any of the stories. if we haven't found some sort of common ground by now we probably should just respect each other's point of view.



deflective

  • Hipparch
  • ******
  • Posts: 1171
Reply #16 on: April 20, 2008, 08:40:50 PM
so i've caught up with the week's podshows: giant, freedom with a small f, the wild y. all of them include men violently oppressing/objectifying women, all of them include women aggressively using their sex to manipulate men.

...I haven't picked up on any of the sexual politics others have in the EPFVerse (?) of late. I take this as a good thing, because it means I really do accept the place of women in my society.

really? you're proud that you're so used to these type of relationships that you don't even see them anymore? this is the place of women in society?

over the past month woman's representation on the podshows has exploded and we've seen maybe one story with a healthy relationship. it is easier to write a short story if you have the conflict of a rocky relationship but is it really this much easier?

and what gets me, what bugs me the most, is that so many of these stories are good. some are great. if they were spaced out over other shows i could have really enjoy them instead of just waiting for the shoe to drop. what will it be this time? woman manipulated into stripping through hypnosis? husband strangling his wife?



Opabinia

  • Palmer
  • **
  • Posts: 35
Reply #17 on: April 20, 2008, 09:13:45 PM
so i've caught up with the week's podshows: giant, freedom with a small f, the wild y. all of them include men violently oppressing/objectifying women, all of them include women aggressively using their sex to manipulate men.

I really think you are assuming the three podcasts collude more than they do. As far as I know, they don't talk to each other about their lineups at all. So if you are going to criticize them, you have to do so each on its own basis.

Giant, to me, does include what you're talking about: men violently oppressing women and the women responding using the tools at their disposal to break free. However, this is a rewritten fairy tale. The events are those in the fairy tale. What is rewritten here is the complication of the character of the giant. The core of the story is about him, and his motivations. So it goes from being a narrative about a brave man who rescues a maiden from a terrible other man, to a story about a man who is trying to break free of the training he has received from his father, and gets screwed over for it, but he feels that it is worth it. That is really an inherently different kind of story than the others (run by PodCastle) that you refer to.

Mod:fixed formatting
« Last Edit: April 20, 2008, 09:16:36 PM by Heradel »



Bdoomed

  • Pseudopod Tiger
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5323
  • Mmm. Tiger.
Reply #18 on: April 20, 2008, 09:40:59 PM
Ooookay.  This thread is getting a little rediculous.  It should be obvious by now that any and all women empowerment stories coming out at the same time was merely coincidence.  There is no evil plot to force feminist ideals on us listeners.  there is also no collaboration by the editors to mess with us. (or what if there is? bum bum buuuuum)

i hope we all agree that double standards are bad, and that they still exist.  Can we do anything about it? no.  not really.  Those of us who CARE enough can.  and all the more power to you if you care.  i dont enough to try.

i hope we ALSO all agree that these stories are good, if not amazing.  As long as we're entertained for 30-50 minutes, everything should be fine.  Personally, i never really noticed a trend until it was brought up, nor did it affect me in any way.  I still get just enough enjoyment out of the stories as if i never knew.  It really should not matter.  If women empowerment/male oppression stories arent your cup of tea, dont listen to them.  its as simple as pressing pause.  you can even lie to yourself about listening to them by skipping to the outro or last 10 seconds.  whatever makes you happy ('you' is not referring to anyone, but everyone in general by the way)

Honestly none of this matters enough to fret over it.  To some, its an odd launch for pod castle, to others, it doesnt matter, and others might be happy about it.  In any case, its all coincidental, and its also WAY too early to start drawing conclusions about the podcast as a whole.  if by, lets say september, it is still overly female, stop listening.  But Escape Artists is good at presenting a multitude of stories, in a very wide variety of categories and appeals.  Im 500% sure that everything will be fine.  I trust Rachel will be/is a great editor, and i also trust that Steve won't let anything happen to Pod Castle that will make a great number of people unhappy.  He's good at that.  Now can we please stop arguing? there really should not be anything to argue about here.  If this matters that much to you, give the 'cast more time so you can gather more evidence and slam it down on all of us poor wretched souls.

Any questions?  Comments?  Concerns?  I really don't care, but post them if you must.

I'd like to hear my options, so I could weigh them, what do you say?
Five pounds?  Six pounds? Seven pounds?


Heradel

  • Bill Peters, EP Assistant
  • Hipparch
  • ******
  • Posts: 2938
  • Part-Time Psychopomp.
Reply #19 on: April 20, 2008, 09:52:52 PM
I wrote most of this before Bdoomed posted his excellent statement, I agree with him completely. But I have this mess of text, and I'm putting in one last rebuttal from me. I'm taking myself out of the argument after this, unless my blue stars are needed.

Quote from: hautdesert
For Fear of Dragons does not feature a protagonist struggling against specifically male oppression.  You could make the priesthood female and the society a matriarchy and not change the story in any fundamental way.  You could make Jeanette a boy, and leave the priests male, and not change the story except for the need to find some sort of virginity test.

The protagonist of For Fear of Dragons is female because of the template she was working from--the maiden given to a dragon as payment/appeasement/sacrifice.  Her gender is what it is because it's traditional, not because it's a story of female empowerment.

it takes a lot of tap dancing to try to make your case in a story that spends its first half sacrificing specifically females and the last half demonizing specifically females while every character doing it is male.

you appear to be saying that the story doesn't contain male oppression because it could have been rewritten so that it doesn't contain male oppression. some part of me applauds this bit of Orwellian mental gymnastics.
The point Hautdesert was making is that the story contains it, but it's not a story about it. 1984 is a story about repressive government regimes, and the government was male-dominated at the top. But it wasn't about males oppressing, it was about government oppressing. In Fear of Dragons we got a story where is was a religious order than was oppressing a segment of the population. It was a male-dominated religious order, but it didn't need to be.

There is a difference, and it's a fundamental one for interpreting the story.

Quote from: hautdesert
For Fear of Dragons seems to me to have chosen a female protagonist out of convention.

this is, in fact, my point exactly. the theme of male oppression isn't necessary for the story but it's included anyway because it's low hanging fruit, a quick way for the author to set the scene. all you need to do is mention dragon sacrifice or witch burning and everyone immediately has an image in mind. in general this is fine but when it's used excessively, especially across multiple stories, it begins to reinforce the stereotypes it invokes. in this case, the stereotype of woman as victim.
I'm not sure it's really a theme. Most of these stories contain characters which are human, and thus must have a gender (Male/Female/Eunuch/Transsexual). Just because a character is male doesn't mean that the story is about male repression of women. Especially where there are a lot lower-hanging explanations for the repression (in this case, needing the populace in a state of fear in order that the religious order can maintain their power, their decision to only use girls for sacrifice because of the presence of a hymen is sexist, but not the reason for the original repression against the society).

Quote from: hautdesert
Now, Firey Horse is a bit trickier.
...
what she's overcoming isn't "male oppression" unless you assume that any heroine triumphing against a male adversary is "female empowerment."

i would argue that since his attention in her becomes sexual and she specifically uses her sex against him it does become a male / female issue.

I would argue that the sexual attraction would have worked if it was two gay men or two lesbians. To limit it by making it strictly male/female and also ignore the role her father plays isn't fair to the story.

There's plenty of great fiction where the characters (male, female or otherwise) use sex to achieve ends, sex and sexual attraction are an integral part of humanity. To give a for-instance of a show that plays with sex among various characters I'd point to Torchwood, which certainly colours outside the traditional lines. Just because sex is depicted with the power it has, even in heterosexual relations, doesn't make it a larger statement. It just makes it more true to life.

Quote from: hautdesert
Quote from: deflective
how often do short story authors employ female main characters and why?
from the stories we've been hearing it's usually used as a quick way to create conflict.
Why do you assume that these stories choose female protagonists as a quick way to create conflict?
...
Sometimes I pick whichever gender would be conventional, because frankly it's easier and I had other things I wanted to play with.
...
Not once have I chosen the gender of a main character because it would shortcut creating conflict with male oppression.

there's a subtle difference between our topics, i didn't use the word choose. sexism doesn't have to be a conscious decision, a point struck upon repeatedly in discussion about wage disparity and other feminist issues. in fact, this ingrained mindset usually isn't even visible to the parties involved.

i've said which stories i think are using male oppression and why. you've said that you think the theme doesn't appear at all in any of the stories. if we haven't found some sort of common ground by now we probably should just respect each other's point of view.

Emphasis mine. That usually isn't helped by stating that the other person is using "Orwellian mental gymnastics" to come to their point.

I agree with Cammo and Opabinia here, I think you're finding these things because you're looking for them, not because they're there. Freedom with a small f has a female lead that is horribly mistreated by the Union, and perhaps Mr. Derego will pop by and explain it more, but I didn't think the reason for having a female lead was to make some big point about how men mistreat women. The Union Dues arc has certainly shown that the superheros as a whole get screwed, not just the female ones.

Escape Artists runs a lot of stories with strong female characters. It also runs stories with strong male characters. And there are weaker characters. Perhaps there has been a spate of strong females going against the patriarchy in the last few weeks, I didn't see it that way, but if you did that's ok. Like BDoomed said, Escape Pod and Pseudopod have pretty long archives at this point, you can check in there to see if your postulate holds true. Podcastle doesn't yet, but I don't think that this trend will continue.
« Last Edit: April 20, 2008, 09:54:49 PM by Heradel »

I Twitter. I also occasionally blog on the Escape Pod blog, which if you're here you shouldn't have much trouble finding.


hautdesert

  • Editor
  • *****
  • Posts: 315
Reply #20 on: April 20, 2008, 11:11:20 PM
Deflective, Heradel is right--contains isn't the same as about.  I performed no gymnastics at all.  Significance is very important--as it happens, the genders of the oppressors and oppressed in Fear of Dragons is so insignificant that you could change it and not change the story in any essentials.  It would still be about the same things, it would still be the same story.  When something is essential to the story, removing it destroys the story, or changes it radically.

It's your assumptions, not what the story was about, that makes you see the genders of the oppressed as somehow essential.

Heradel is also correct that the sexual attraction angle would have worked in Fiery horse if both had been male, or both female, or if the genders had been reversed.

And, you know, pretty much everything else that Heradel said is right on the nose.



deflective

  • Hipparch
  • ******
  • Posts: 1171
Reply #21 on: April 20, 2008, 11:30:12 PM
Bdoomed, Heradel, i'm almost certain this wasn't intentional but between the two of you you just reminded me that you're moderators and asked me to stop arguing. i need to know that you weren't asking me as moderators.

i've gone out of my way to move any and all conversation on this topic into one thread and have only talked to the people that were already talking about it. if i've gotten shrill or there's something i should be doing please let me know, i'd prefer a message as not to distract from the thread.



Heradel

  • Bill Peters, EP Assistant
  • Hipparch
  • ******
  • Posts: 2938
  • Part-Time Psychopomp.
Reply #22 on: April 20, 2008, 11:46:15 PM
Bdoomed, Heradel, i'm almost certain this wasn't intentional but between the two of you you just reminded me that you're moderators and asked me to stop arguing. i need to know that you weren't asking me as moderators.

i've gone out of my way to move any and all conversation on this topic into one thread and have only talked to the people that were already talking about it. if i've gotten shrill or there's something i should be doing please let me know, i'd prefer a message as not to distract from the thread.

Bdoomed might have been, I wasn't. I was involved in the thread, so I have a conflict of interest, which was why I asked Bdoomed to come in and take a look. I was almost about to hit post, went away to grab something to eat, got back and he'd posted. I had the post, wanted to respond, which I did, and as stated, I'm out of the thread unless my blue stars are needed.

As a rule, we don't usually put the breaks on threads. I'm pretty sure all the non-spam threads that have been locked I can count on one hand. Personally I wouldn't intervene in a thread unless someone's exercise of free speech was infringing on the rights of others. Usually via ad hominem attacks or through hate speech/ one of the bad -isms. Personally I feel like your statement concerning Orwellian mental gymnastics crossed the ad hominem line, but being COI'd, my text here has no added weight save that of someone that's been here for a while.

I Twitter. I also occasionally blog on the Escape Pod blog, which if you're here you shouldn't have much trouble finding.


deflective

  • Hipparch
  • ******
  • Posts: 1171
Reply #23 on: April 21, 2008, 12:42:00 AM
the three podcasts ... don't talk to each other ... So if you are going to criticize them, you have to do so each on its own basis.

the point i'm trying to eventually get to will eventually cover all the fiction. i agree that the way this thread wound up in the podcastle forum is unfortunate, there's no one place it belongs.

It's your assumptions, not what the story was about, that makes you see the genders of the oppressed as somehow essential.

ah, here's the problem. i wasn't trying to claim that it was essential, just that it was definitely, blatantly a part of it.

i may have been misusing the word theme, perhaps device would be more appropriate. would people be able to generally agree if i stated my position as follows?

the recent stories have relied on male oppression as a device.
(include all standard qualifiers about being non-accusative and only referring to the stories previously mentioned)



Rachel Swirsky

  • Hipparch
  • ******
  • Posts: 1233
    • PodCastle
Reply #24 on: April 21, 2008, 12:56:46 AM
Hey Deflective,

I appreciate that you're still here and willing to chat, even with so much disagreement. I get that you're being non-accusative ,and I really appreciate it. These are definitely issues to think about.

I'll say that some of the reasons I actually like "Run of the Fiery Horse" and "Giant" are because they don't just work with male oppression.

"Run of the Fiery Horse" has this beautiful, healthy relationship between Li Chi and Master Li. He's a fantastic father. He knows her flaws; he knows how deeply she doesn't fit in their culture; he urges her to medidate and find peace. He loves her anyway, and she trusts him.

I see "Giant" as one in a long line of fairy tale retellings that works specifically to counteract the obnoxious black and white assumptions of folktales. What's appealing to me about "Giant" is the giant's tenderness as he strives to be a better person, his need to trust and to love, his having been cut off from affection since he was a small child and his desire to reconnect to that affection. He's willing to risk (and lose) his life in order to pretend that he's loved -- and to me, that's so much more poignant and interesting than the original fairy tale version, in which he reveals his secret thorugh accident, stupidity or arrogance.

I actually made the comment to my fiance a few days ago that I see this as a story of male empowerment -- if we were to use the framing of the men's rights movement, we could see the giant as a gender-deviant male, one who is not like his alpha male father, who's using the tools at his disposal to obtain love in a forbidding environment, and who is ultimately screwed over by society's (his mother's, his father's, the princess's) expectations of what an alpha male, a giant, must be.

As a side point, in "For Fear of Dragons," "Run of the Fiery Horse," and my story "Heartstrung" (which is in the run of what you're seeing as feminist stories -- and, as the author, I can definitely say it was intended to be a feminist story) women are all contributing to the oppression of other women. It's not Master Li who wants to bind Li Chi's feet; it's Dowager Eng who crows about how her massive feet and massive energy must be contained. The protagonist of For Fear of Dragons is introduced to the normalcy of her role as sacrifice by her mother. And the seamstress in "Heartstrung" is, perhaps, the piece's main villain -- she chooses to hurt her daughter, as she has been hurt, and fails (perhaps understandably, if I did my job) to envision an active method to end the cycle of violence that is perpetuated by mothers against their daughters. One of the things I was trying (perhaps unsuccessfully) to establish in that story was women's role in oppression.

That's just how I see the stories. I'm just trying to share what I think; I don't want you to feel overwhelmed or anything. I hope to meet you in the same spirit you're offering your criticism, by explaining my take, in case there's something there that's a litlte interesting. I hope it's a little helpful, anyway.
« Last Edit: April 21, 2008, 01:00:46 AM by Rachel Swirsky »