Escape Artists

News:

News

ATTENTION: NEW FORUM THEME Please see here for details: http://forum.escapeartists.net/index.php?topic=13188.0

Author Topic: PC030: Grand Guignol  (Read 17650 times)

mbrennan

  • Matross
  • ****
  • Posts: 163
Reply #25 on: October 26, 2008, 06:32:05 AM
I should clarify what I mean about thinking "genre or not?" is a relevant question.  I recognize that genres are artificial categories, and arguing about what does and does not fit into them rapidly becomes a waste of time; it's inherently a subjective question.  Fantasy is what we decide it is.  But of course genres shape people's expectations -- what I was getting at in the previous post -- and frustrated expectations can be more disappointing than a bad story.


--Marie



Kaa

  • Hipparch
  • ******
  • Posts: 618
  • Trusst in me, jusst in me.
    • WriteWright
Reply #26 on: October 26, 2008, 06:54:57 AM
genres shape people's expectations...and frustrated expectations can be more disappointing than a bad story.

I said something similar a while back when the story The Sloan Men aired on one of the EscapeArtists podcasts.  I started listening to it, forgot which podcast I was listening to, and realized that because of that, I had no idea how to "expect" it to end.

Had it been Escape Pod, I was expecting aliens or pod people, and with an upbeat ending ("Fun!" is Steve's criterion).

Had it been Pseudopod, I was expecting a very down ending, as horror stories don't tend to have happy endings.

And had it been Podcastle, I expected a more ambivalent ending, with demons or something supernatural-y instead of aliens.  (Which I believe it actually was, implying that it was, in fact, on Podcastle.)

I kept expecting with this one to find out that they were actually being killed on stage every night and then brought back to life. Or that they were all vampires.  Or all ghosts.  Or creating the reality of the play. Or...just something with a definite fantasy element.  And I think that my not getting this is what made it very 'meh' for me.

So, yes, genre discussions are quite valid because they by definition form opinions for those of us who listen to the stories as to what is going to appear in a given story.  This was a much less valid argument before Pseudopod and Podcastle split off from Escape Pod and subdivided the genres.  To say that genre doesn't matter is specious at best because by splitting them into three podcasts, you've demonstrated quite nicely that they do matter, and that our expectations are going to be informed by the statement--implied or not--that the story is "fantasy."

Granted, "fantasy" covers a wider range than do "horror" and "science fiction."

And I'll end this by saying that I by no means think this story didn't belong on Podcastle.  It just didn't do anything for me.  And I'll keep listening and hope the next ones do.  No story is going to please everyone.

I invent imaginary people and make them have conversations in my head. I also write.

About writing || About Atheism and Skepticism (mostly) || About Everything Else


cuddlebug

  • Peltast
  • ***
  • Posts: 145
Reply #27 on: October 26, 2008, 10:55:29 AM
OMG, I am absolutely gobsmacked. Oh, the skill, the skill … Every word seemed to be placed precicely, creating an amazingly visual experience. Actually, I had to listen to this story 3 times, the first time while I was walking I kept thinking What? WHAT? What was that? And was totally frustrated. The second time while running around the flat, cleaning and cooking, was just as frustrating. But the third time I actually sat down and listened and LOVED it, the story is so full with character, an incredible setting and atmosphere, I started painting a weird bohemian picture in my head, with loads of detail and texture.

This was a great story, actually I can see a number of spin-offs from this, it seemed as if there were so many more stories hidden in it.
And the reading was perfect. 

I applaud you Andy Duncan and Frank Key. You may paint a picture in your head of an audience giving you standing ovations, throwing flowers on the stage, maybe chocolates, or panties even. 

So now I have to go and read what the other posters have said. That is just as exciting as the stories themselves. Well almost.



cuddlebug

  • Peltast
  • ***
  • Posts: 145
Reply #28 on: October 26, 2008, 11:28:49 AM
Oh no, I can't believe the reactions to this story were so negative. This comes to show how different our tastes in the community are. But I can see how people could get frustrated at the density of the story especially when listening with one ear only and being distracted with the other. Maybe this story is just easier to digest on paper. Well, as I said I was really frustrated the first 2 times I listened.

And as for the fantasy or not discussion. I personally couldn't give a rat's arse if it qualifies as fantasy or not, I enjoyed he story and that's all I care about. I like a wide variety of stories and this one was certainly 'different' and fantastical enough for me. So good choice, Ann and Rachel.



hautdesert

  • Editor
  • *****
  • Posts: 315
Reply #29 on: October 26, 2008, 03:57:23 PM
Just for the record, my post wasn't meant to be a defense.  I didn't pick the story (i don't ever pick, Rachel does), though also for the record if I had been Rachel I would have picked it.

It was just that, I was surprised by the "it's not fantasy" responses, and was trying to figure out why I was surprised, and why it felt like fantasy to me.  So I offered my thoughts. 



Rachel Swirsky

  • Hipparch
  • ******
  • Posts: 1233
    • PodCastle
Reply #30 on: October 26, 2008, 05:27:54 PM
Quote
Though I have a feeling you'll need to get used to the "is this story in this genre" discussions. I've gone through several opinions about them myself, and right now I'm in a "if you can't beat them, join them" phase, but since you run a podcast that, literally, wears its genre on its banner, you're going to face them again and again

Oh, I'm sure. ;)

I hear people who say genre expectations shape how they listen to stories. For me, that's not a reason never to publish anything that counters expectations, but I totally hear what you're saying.

If it helps, I don't think we have anything scheduled through the end of January that's not straight-up fantastic fantasy. :-D



Roney

  • Lochage
  • *****
  • Posts: 440
Reply #31 on: October 26, 2008, 08:44:27 PM
I find the "genre or not?" issue relevant because if I'm listening to a fantasy story, a part of my brain is waiting for the magic to show up.

I can appreciate that.  Until about half-way through I was in a similar place, frequently expecting the acting to turn out not to be an act (or some other theatrical plot cliché).  Then I decided that the fantasy twist would turn up when the time was right, I would stop trying to second-guess it, and just relaxed and enjoyed the ride.  This turned out to be a much better frame of mind in which to appreciate this story.

It was wonderful.  Although I have some sympathy for the opinion that it wasn't fantasy and doesn't belong in a fantasy podcast, I think PodCastle would have been the poorer for not running it.  If we get more stories as imaginative and elegant as this one, I won't complain.



mbrennan

  • Matross
  • ****
  • Posts: 163
Reply #32 on: October 27, 2008, 03:11:00 AM
Maybe all I really want is a heads-up in the intro, letting me know how much fantasy to expect. :-)  (No, I'm not asking for any kind of actual metric.  But I think I might appreciate the "realism with just a touch of the fantastic" stories more if I knew that was what I'd to be listening to.)


--Marie



Rachel Swirsky

  • Hipparch
  • ******
  • Posts: 1233
    • PodCastle
Reply #33 on: October 27, 2008, 01:53:50 PM
Just wanted to say that it's lovely to see you here, Ms. Brennan.



ryos

  • Palmer
  • **
  • Posts: 60
Reply #34 on: October 28, 2008, 09:36:20 PM
I finally found an episode I couldn't finish.   
While Frank Key can read real well, this story just wasn't for his voice. 
The movement from narrator to narrator without any change in inflection left me scratching my head about what was happening.
I Just couldn't follow it.  I'm almost sorry that I did not enjoy it like HMM did, I could have used a good laugh.

Me too. It didn't hold my interest. I stopped it 11 minutes in out of sheer boredom.



Dwango

  • Matross
  • ****
  • Posts: 165
Reply #35 on: October 29, 2008, 07:35:04 PM
This story was rather dense and hard to swallow.  But it was a wonderful story in any event.  I liked the characters and the setting, and enjoyed the positive ending.  This would definitely not fit well on PseudoPod with such a nice, non-violent ending where no one was truly dismembered or bleeding.  I don't really care that it had only fantasy trimmings and would rather hear a good story that barely fits a genre than a bad story the fits it well.

I thought it was interesting how the proper doctor turns out to be a worse person in his actions than the people of the grotesque horror theater.  This is an extreme case of being happy with who you are, even if you do hear dead nuns praying over our souls and take pride in making people upchuck.  The psychologist doesn't seem to deal with his own mental quirks that well, allowing his jealousy to rule his mind.  The point with him seemed to be that being eccentric is not as bad as being a crooked jerk.




mbrennan

  • Matross
  • ****
  • Posts: 163
Reply #36 on: October 30, 2008, 07:20:02 AM
::waves hi to Rachel::

I'm finally getting caught up on podcasts, so for the first time it's worth my while to check the forums for discussion, instead of just hearing it recapped on a later episode. :-)



Corydon

  • Peltast
  • ***
  • Posts: 113
Reply #37 on: October 30, 2008, 02:39:04 PM
Oh, Grand Guignol!  You had me at "a bag of eyeballs".

Seriously, this was my favorite EA story in ages.  I don't have too much to say about it right now, other than that the setting and atmosphere were spot-on and drew me right in; the black humor made me laugh out loud; and Frank Key's reading, as always, was masterful.  I laughed!  I cried!  It was better than "Cats"!

On a more serious note, the story led me to read up on the real Grand Guignol-- I didn't realize that Binet and de Lorde were real people.  But this note from Wikipedia, on the theater's closing, was especially affecting:

Quote
The Grand Guignol theatre closed its doors in 1962. "We could never equal Buchenwald," said its final director, Charles Nonon, on the theatre's decline and fall. "Before the war, everyone felt that what was happening onstage was impossible. Now we know that these things, and worse, are possible in reality."



Hobart Floyt

  • Extern
  • *
  • Posts: 14
Reply #38 on: October 31, 2008, 03:35:00 AM
Hmm...  I guess all I can say is that I liked it. Especially the bit where the tortured artist plays a well deserved prank on the plagiarist psychologist/collaborator. I was confused at times because of the narration/pronunciation but that is a good reason to listen again. It's sort of like a very short version of the bible, in a metaphorical sense. The more you read it the more you glean from the subtleties. Perhaps a lifetime of listening/reading will not be enough. There will always be something more to learn/understand. Perhaps you sense a/pattern.

Ah well, in the end I simply liked it. It held my attention. It was entertaining. I love Frank's voice even if it's difficult to understand at times. Can you beat a British accent, even when mimicking French? I love it!

Having said that. This is not my favorite so far. I loved M. K. Hobson's narration/embodiment of Dead Languages. If you missed it I would recommend that you listen to it. If you didn't like it I would recommend that you listen again and again and again. I think this might change your mind. If not, then................


Thank You for being another PodCastle reader,

Gary

PS Pass it on! (The podcast, I mean) Just like McDonald's. I'm lovin' it!

In the midst of the word he was trying to say,
  In the midst of his laughter and glee,
He had softly and suddenly vanished away—
  For the Snark was a Boojum, you see.


sjg1978

  • Extern
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Reply #39 on: November 05, 2008, 12:22:26 PM
Well, this is the first episode of Podcastle which has totally failed me. 

I think the reading was fine, but I just couldn't keep myself listening to "the horror voice guy" in a fantasy story.
With that voice, it just felt like a horror story developing, and I'm not a horror fan. I really gave it a try. I listened to the 10 minute mark. But still, it was a no go, so I quit listening and moved on.



JoeFitz

  • Matross
  • ****
  • Posts: 258
Reply #40 on: November 13, 2008, 09:24:48 PM
I enjoyed this piece, but didn't necessarily think it was a very strong PC offering. It was a little too dense, really, for an audio format. The shifts in narrator often doesn't work for me in audio unless there are different voice actors reading each section. I also thought that the theater history/alt-history angle was a tad obscure, though it did add a little to the story in retrospect.

I find this somewhat ironic for me to be saying this, but this particular story calls out for an outro about the real Grand Guignol, or some forshadowing? It's a fine line, granted, but I actually missed a slightly "spoilery" intro/outro.



Unblinking

  • Sir Postsalot
  • Hipparch
  • ******
  • Posts: 8729
    • Diabolical Plots
Reply #41 on: January 06, 2010, 03:19:31 PM
Historical fiction isn't really my cup of tea, and this was no exception.  The switches in narrator without changing tone of voice left me lost, and to the point that I listened to, none of the characters really interested me enough to care what happened to them.