Escape Artists
November 19, 2018, 06:40:18 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5  All
  Print  
Author Topic: PC029: Dead Languages  (Read 34886 times)
Heradel
Bill Peters, EP Assistant
Hipparch
******
Posts: 2938


Part-Time Psychopomp.


« on: October 17, 2008, 12:26:32 AM »

PC029: Dead Languages

By Merrie Haskell
Read by M. K. Hobson

“I have a confession,” Annabel said, steering the car into the snow-dusted mall parking lot. “I have involved us in a crazy scheme.

“Oh?” I asked, suddenly alert to my get-away options. Crazy schemes and Annabel had been getting me into trouble since I was six, when she convinced me to steal all the crayons from the art room to melt into a giant ball of wax.

“I’ve gotten you the lead in an independent short film.”

“What?” I shrieked. I admit: not my witty best, but I was trying to be discreet in wrapping my fingers around the door handle and calculating the car’s speed.

Annabel locked the car and smiled with a vague and friendly sort of evil. “There’s no need to thank me.”


Rated PG. Contains vampires, ass-kicking, and hijinx.
« Last Edit: October 20, 2008, 12:43:50 AM by Heradel » Logged

I Twitter. I also occasionally blog on the Escape Pod blog, which if you're here you shouldn't have much trouble finding.
DKT
Friendly Neighborhood
Hipparch
******
Posts: 4980


PodCastle is my Co-Pilot


WWW
« Reply #1 on: October 17, 2008, 12:37:56 AM »

Contains vampires, ass-kicking, and hijinx.


Pretty much all I need to know Grin
Logged

Ragtime
Palmer
**
Posts: 45


WWW
« Reply #2 on: October 17, 2008, 08:13:49 AM »

I liked it a lot.  Not terribly original -- it seems like lots of horror stories are set on the set of a horror movie -- but very well done inside the genre.  The best part was the pacing, I thought.  Everything moved along from event to event, without the usual too-much-pondering of "how" and "why."  The worst part was the cringe-worthy insinuations -- battered down, but always picked back up -- that Lillian is considering a relationship with her "sidekick," even though they both know that his love is only the result of the spell.

Also, there seems like there was some sort of complete failure to edit the piece  -- lots of repeated lines and a "Take Two" thrown in there.
Logged
Rachel Swirsky
Hipparch
******
Posts: 1233



WWW
« Reply #3 on: October 17, 2008, 09:40:19 AM »

For people who may have noticed them -- I've passed on a note about unedited outtakes to our audio editor.
Logged
Ragtime
Palmer
**
Posts: 45


WWW
« Reply #4 on: October 17, 2008, 10:04:16 AM »

One more thought, looking at the opening again.

The first sentence seems like its bucking for a "great first lines" prize, but actually doesn't make a lot of sense it context.  Annabel really didn't involve them in a "crazy scheme."  At least not based on what she knew at the time.

So, the first sentence is my new least-favorite part. 

Since that means I should pick a new "favorite part," I'm going to go with Strege Nona's concept of little bits of magic escaping into the world.  Unfortunately, I can't think of Strege Nona any more without thinking of the kids' book about the bottomless spaghetti pot, but that's not the author's fault.
Logged
DKT
Friendly Neighborhood
Hipparch
******
Posts: 4980


PodCastle is my Co-Pilot


WWW
« Reply #5 on: October 17, 2008, 10:37:59 AM »

For people who may have noticed them -- I've passed on a note about unedited outtakes to our audio editor.

I haven't listened yet and am wondering: should I wait? Is a re-edited one going to drop in the feed?
Logged

Rachel Swirsky
Hipparch
******
Posts: 1233



WWW
« Reply #6 on: October 17, 2008, 10:46:07 AM »

I feel silly for not knowing how to answer that question. When we get a new file, I'll replace the one in the blog entry. Will that cause the feed to recollect it? I'm assuming not. Maybe I should delete the blog entry and make a new one when we get the corrected file?

I doubt the errors are enough to seriously impair a listening experience (though I may be corrected)... though personally, I hate finding errors in a file when I'm expecting it to be perfect, but knowing there will be a few later on allows me to shrug it off, so that's just my feeling. I guess it depends on how much you feel a few repeated phrases and one "Take two" will bother you.
Logged
Listener
Hipparch
******
Posts: 3187


I place things in locations which later elude me.


WWW
« Reply #7 on: October 17, 2008, 02:15:04 PM »

The reading was very good, except for the audio typos, but those have been discussed. (I _did_ offer to help do audio editing, way back when Steve made the call. Just sayin'.)

I liked the premise, but the five minutes of driving around and talking about feminism and being fat...? I could live without it. It felt like the author trying to make a point before finally getting to the interesting bits. I liked also that there was no way to reverse the process... so many "oops I cast a spell" stories have plot coupons and easy reversals. The Christian subplot was kind of silly.

A pretty good story overall. Not awesome, but I'm not complaining.

Logged

"Farts are a hug you can smell." -Wil Wheaton

Blog || Quote Blog ||  Written and Audio Work || Twitter: @listener42
thomasowenm
Lochage
*****
Posts: 364


Servant of The Orator Maleficent


« Reply #8 on: October 17, 2008, 06:20:39 PM »

I give it a strong B,  the characters for the most part were enjoyable, minus Christian.  The plot of an old ancient medallion mistakenly causing magical mischief is as old as probably storytelling itself, but it seemed fresh in this story.   Maybe just imagining Jolly old St. Nicks hurting each other for  Alpha Santa status was just twisted enough to freshen it up for me.   Smiley

I also liked that there wasn't any reversal chant, drink, or any other device in the story, but probably all the geeks playing Harry Potter who found that their wands now work could come up with one. 

My two cents on the editing.   Mistakes happen, but I had a hard time getting thrown back in the story over and over again.  When I reread a passage in a novel I get very frustrated for not marking my place.  I felt that same frustration with the missed edits. 
Logged
Rachel Swirsky
Hipparch
******
Posts: 1233



WWW
« Reply #9 on: October 17, 2008, 10:12:10 PM »

Okay, the fixed audio file has been uploaded, but I did not create a new blog entry. I'm not sure what effect this has on the feed -- if anyone wants to let me know, I'd appreciate it.
Logged
Kaa
Hipparch
******
Posts: 614


Trusst in me, jusst in me.


WWW
« Reply #10 on: October 17, 2008, 11:00:40 PM »

I really enjoyed this one, although I do agree that the diatribe about feminism at the beginning needs to go.  Not because it's a diatribe and not because it was about feminism and I have a Y chromosome, but because it dumped liquid nitrogen on the pacing.

The only thing that surprised me was that no mention was made of all the cross-dressers who suddenly found themselves with real parts, or the kids in Spiderman or Wonder Woman pajamas that suddenly found themselves climbing walls or flying invisible jets. Smiley

Oh, and kudos on the reading.  That was just amazing.
« Last Edit: October 17, 2008, 11:02:22 PM by Kaa » Logged

I invent imaginary people and make them have conversations in my head. I also write.

About writing || About Atheism and Skepticism (mostly) || About Everything Else
deflective
Hipparch
******
Posts: 1171



« Reply #11 on: October 17, 2008, 11:51:01 PM »

the escape artists' editors say over and over that they don't collaborate so this week is a strong case for culturally collective thinking. halloween could explain two vampire stories but two vampire stories with a feminist/anti-masculine viewpoint? an odd coincidence.

this story had a few things worth commenting about but thomasowenm brought up a big one (and now Kaa). speculative fiction authors tend to to introduce huge, world changing events without thinking through the consequences. this isn't always a big deal but it is distracting. where were the santas in the story? what happened to women as they realized that their makeup wasn't coming off and their underwire bra had disappeared, leaving them larger and unnaturally perky? why did the vampire take the personality of his character but the vampire hunter remain herself? did every room using mirrors to create an illusion of space suddenly get larger?

yeah, yeah, too picky. but i appreciate at least an attempt to think through and resolve speculation in a story.

<big-geek>
it's funny that Rachel went with Buffy for the intro, the whole costume-becomes-real event was used in one of the halloween episodes.

if you want to understand Whedon fandom without putting in a full seven seasons i would suggest watching the top five episodes (ideally with a fan to fill in background) rather than slogging through the first season. the first season is generally considered weak. at a minimum, everyone should see the musical episode. =)
</big-geek>

by the way, refreshed the feed and didn't download a new copy.
« Last Edit: October 18, 2008, 01:12:48 PM by deflective » Logged
Heradel
Bill Peters, EP Assistant
Hipparch
******
Posts: 2938


Part-Time Psychopomp.


« Reply #12 on: October 18, 2008, 12:28:03 AM »

Okay, the fixed audio file has been uploaded, but I did not create a new blog entry. I'm not sure what effect this has on the feed -- if anyone wants to let me know, I'd appreciate it.

[...]
by the way, refreshed the feed and didn't download a new copy.

Uploading the new file will only affect future downloads, those that already have a copy will need to (in iTunes at least), delete the file, unsubscribe, re-subscribe, and download it again to get the corrected version.

Logged

I Twitter. I also occasionally blog on the Escape Pod blog, which if you're here you shouldn't have much trouble finding.
Peter Tupper
Palmer
**
Posts: 34


« Reply #13 on: October 18, 2008, 02:29:40 AM »

Production glitches aside, I enjoyed this story. I wasn't quite sure why, but maybe it is because it reminds me of its source material.

I don't think it lives up to it's premise, a feminist take on Buffy the Vampire Slayer, other than the protagonist not being a perfect size four. There's a Oedipal angle in that the protagonist inadvertently caused the magical chaos, but otherwise she's still the reluctant female hero with superhuman abilities who relies on her allies for emotional support in her monster-infested small town where the conventional authorities are helpless. Even the tone of the story is fairly Whedonesque, the contrast between the mundane and the fantastic.
Logged
Heradel
Bill Peters, EP Assistant
Hipparch
******
Posts: 2938


Part-Time Psychopomp.


« Reply #14 on: October 18, 2008, 02:42:08 AM »

I don't think it lives up to it's premise, a feminist take on Buffy the Vampire Slayer, other than the protagonist not being a perfect size four. There's a Oedipal angle in that the protagonist inadvertently caused the magical chaos, but otherwise she's still the reluctant female hero with superhuman abilities who relies on her allies for emotional support in her monster-infested small town where the conventional authorities are helpless. Even the tone of the story is fairly Whedonesque, the contrast between the mundane and the fantastic.

I haven't had time to listen to the story yet (Deadlines! Programs! Middle English Poetry!), but I always thought Buffy was the feminist Buffy. Whedon's been accused of a lot of things (most unforgivably not letting two characters just be happy), but I don't think misogyny is one of them.
Logged

I Twitter. I also occasionally blog on the Escape Pod blog, which if you're here you shouldn't have much trouble finding.
Rachel Swirsky
Hipparch
******
Posts: 1233



WWW
« Reply #15 on: October 18, 2008, 09:27:54 AM »

Quote
I always thought Buffy was the feminist Buffy.

Pretty much. Though I still can't stand Buffy.

If anything, I think this is a parody of Buffy, not an attempt at one-upmanship. Well, plus funny on its own,  or at least I thought it was funny.
Logged
cede
Extern
*
Posts: 10



« Reply #16 on: October 18, 2008, 11:45:48 AM »

the intro part about being into fantasy but hating buffy seemed kind of strange to me, i also hate buffy. i've never thought the 2 were related but i never really think genre specific when enjoying a story. enjoyed this one, i liked this chick's reading, sounds like the same one who read the story about the shrinking chainmail. the bad editing was very annoying, took a bit away from the story for me, easy to not pay full attention to something if i'm worrying that something's going to bug me. pseudopod also had a vampire related story this week, um, quite different of course.
Logged
sirana
Lochage
*****
Posts: 409



« Reply #17 on: October 18, 2008, 12:33:52 PM »


I haven't had time to listen to the story yet (Deadlines! Programs! Middle English Poetry!), but I always thought Buffy was the feminist Buffy. Whedon's been accused of a lot of things (most unforgivably not letting two characters just be happy), but I don't think misogyny is one of them.

You obviously haven't read A Rapist's View of the World: Joss Whedon and Firefly. It's all about how Firefly is the most mysoginistic piece of television. And sadly, it isn't a parody... Even more sad are some of the comments congratulating the author on her brilliant analysis.
« Last Edit: October 18, 2008, 12:37:29 PM by sirana » Logged
mkhobson
Palmer
**
Posts: 24


"Only the irrational is unendurable." -Epictetus


WWW
« Reply #18 on: October 18, 2008, 01:38:36 PM »

I want to thank everyone who's said nice things about my reading, and send out my personal apology for the audio errors! This was the first piece I ever recorded for Podcastle (though "Hallah Iron Thighs" and my intro for "Tanuki Kettle" happened to come out first) and I ... uh ... kinda didn't know how to use Sound Studio very well. I also had a crappy mike, which I've since replaced. And the dog ate my homework.  Grin

I have since figured out how to edit my own files, and in the future I won't be sending anything in to Rachel that I wouldn't feel confident having appear on the 'cast as-is. It's one thing to screw up your own story in a reading, but it's quite another to have your reading reflect badly on someone *else's* work!!

Thanks everyone for your patience. And kudos to Rachel and crew for getting an edited version up so fast! This team works so hard, and cares so much about putting out a quality product. They deserve lots of praise!

M.K. Hobson
mkhobson.livejournal.com | www.demimonde.com
Logged

Check it out, I've even got a signature now!
www.demimonde.com
Heradel
Bill Peters, EP Assistant
Hipparch
******
Posts: 2938


Part-Time Psychopomp.


« Reply #19 on: October 18, 2008, 07:50:54 PM »


I haven't had time to listen to the story yet (Deadlines! Programs! Middle English Poetry!), but I always thought Buffy was the feminist Buffy. Whedon's been accused of a lot of things (most unforgivably not letting two characters just be happy), but I don't think misogyny is one of them.

You obviously haven't read A Rapist's View of the World: Joss Whedon and Firefly. It's all about how Firefly is the most mysoginistic piece of television. And sadly, it isn't a parody... Even more sad are some of the comments congratulating the author on her brilliant analysis.

Wow, either that person is incapable of humor or couldn't get past what she wanted to see to see the characters being portrayed (and for the record, I grew up next to an interracial couple that had been together since the late sixties/early seventies). Just because one an make an argument to a certain effect, doesn't mean one should.



On another note, I liked this story and I had actually just read the Battle of Brunanburg this afternoon for class.
Logged

I Twitter. I also occasionally blog on the Escape Pod blog, which if you're here you shouldn't have much trouble finding.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!