I didn't really enjoy the reading.
The story not only didn't feel new enough to grab my interest, but it also seemed like it was trying to be more twisted than it actually was. Yvonne should've been smart enough to see that Roger was reverse-psychology-ing her into fighting harder for Alice's case; Yvonne had it too easy escaping with Alice; Roger's monologuing at the end was thoroughly predictable. Perhaps because the plot contained well-used sci-fi tropes -- something in the water, crime defeated by drugs, drug/memory modification therapy, the establishment member working with the underground, anyone who is against all this is considered a terrorist -- I was less enthused by it.
Plus, I think the details were too much sometimes -- every single little detail of Yvonne's trip home, reading a book, drinking a glass of milk, etc. Some of them -- taking all those pills, for example -- were necessary and vivid, but others I felt dragged the story down.
I also think it was trying a little too hard to namecheck Atlanta points of interest -- Grady Hospital and MARTA, specifically. I fully admit I do the same thing in my stories, but maybe I'll back off a little in the future. I think there's a point writers have to reach that's just the right distance between accuracy and good storytelling. I might be sensitized to Atlanta namechecking in particular because I live here too, though.