Escape Artists

News:

News

ATTENTION: NEW FORUM THEME Please see here for details: http://forum.escapeartists.net/index.php?topic=13188.0

Author Topic: Super Long Pre-Episode Content Warning  (Read 9652 times)

matweller

  • EA Staff
  • *****
  • Posts: 678
Reply #25 on: September 26, 2014, 12:07:37 PM
Like I said, it just sorta fascinates me to see how differently it gets used in different places. Especially in cases where they just say "trigger warning" and then move on without saying what the trigger is that their warning about. It's uselessly vast.

But it all depends on the community and context, doesn't it? In contexts where you're addressing a general audience, such as "people who enjoy spec fic", which likely includes a wide cross section of society, it makes sense to take into account the most demographically common sources of PTSD if you decide you want to make something accessible to the subset of your audience dealing with this, or who will deal with this (noting that there are undoubtedly plenty of EA fans, for example, who have survived rape since they began listening). While PTSD can be caused and triggered by any number of traumatic things, it doesn't make sense in a general context to try and guess at everything, nor would a person with PTSD expect you to.

But let's pretend there's a small town somewhere in upstate New York where mutant apple-wielding emus violently murdered most of the population before the horrified eyes of the survivors. These people develop PTSD as a result, generally triggered by apples and emus, as their brains now unfortunately react to these things in a very real way. People in the region might develop a custom of being considerate toward the survivors by including a TW for the Great Emu Massacre when they write about it on locally-oriented blogs. This is because the locals want the survivors to be fully included in the community. They don't want them having to isolate themselves from perfectly good things that everyone gets to enjoy just to preserve their mental health.

We might run across the blog and think the very specific TW is absurd and unnecessary--but that's not true at all, because it's not about us. Within communities that contain people living with specific forms of PTSD, even really uncommon ones, they have a right to take these people into account and use TWs accordingly. It's different in the context of a general audience, though.
Of course the specific makes sense, I said the immensely non-specific was pointless. It gets used for something as simple as the use of the word "sex," which is overly-simplistic, silly and I would guess insulting. If you're that sensitive, you're probably an agoraphobic with no phone, radio or television.



Varda

  • Rebound
  • Hipparch
  • ******
  • Posts: 2710
  • Definitely not an android.
Reply #26 on: September 26, 2014, 12:26:02 PM
Of course the specific makes sense, I said the immensely non-specific was pointless. It gets used for something as simple as the use of the word "sex," which is overly-simplistic, silly and I would guess insulting. If you're that sensitive, you're probably an agoraphobic with no phone, radio or television.

Do you have an example? I've never, ever seen a TW used just because something contained the word "sex" in it. Are you sure you're not thinking of movie ratings or content warnings?

General TWs are usually given within an assumed context. If a person just says "TW on this link" when, say, they share it on social media, they're speaking to the people in their circles they already know suffer from PTSD. I personally think it's more helpful to be a little more specific, but the point is still it's a tool used within a community to allow accessibility to injured people, not something being demanded by the injured people.

And as a side note, please can we stop using the word "sensitive" about people with PTSD? We're not talking about people who are too easily offended; we're talking about people with injuries. If you don't have legs, you're not being too sensitive or demanding if you need a little help getting up the stairs. People who don't like something because it offends them are an entirely different topic and not at all related to the reasons anyone should or shouldn't choose to use TWs.

Medical Microfiction: Stories About Science
http://rckjones.wordpress.com


matweller

  • EA Staff
  • *****
  • Posts: 678
Reply #27 on: September 26, 2014, 01:38:08 PM
And as a side note, please can we stop using the word "sensitive" about people with PTSD? We're not talking about people who are too easily offended; we're talking about people with injuries. If you don't have legs, you're not being too sensitive or demanding if you need a little help getting up the stairs. People who don't like something because it offends them are an entirely different topic and not at all related to the reasons anyone should or shouldn't choose to use TWs.
Sorry, I was thinking more like people with open, bleeding wounds and third degree burns are sensitive to the slightest touches.



Unblinking

  • Sir Postsalot
  • Hipparch
  • ******
  • Posts: 8729
    • Diabolical Plots
Reply #28 on: September 26, 2014, 01:46:49 PM
Thanks for elaborating on the reasoning behind Trigger Warnings, Varda.  I guess I'd kind of lumped them together in my mind with general content warnings about sex and swearing and the like, but just tended to  hear "trigger" in the cases where it was more on the extreme side--just a variation of degree between the two terms.  The way you're explaining it totally makes sense, and it seems that trigger warnings and content warnings are completely different things that just happen to share a little overlap (i.e. things meriting a trigger warning would probably also merit a content warning but the reverse isn't generally true). 



Scuba Man

  • Matross
  • ****
  • Posts: 291
  • Drabblecast, Pseudopod, Escapepod, Podcastle
    • Black Cat Bed And Breakfast (proposed start up 2024)
Reply #29 on: December 21, 2014, 05:55:24 PM
I'm disappointed that Escape Artists has to add such warnings for a horror podcast in the first place.  Horror. That means bunny rabbits with sharp teeth!  Or, something to that effect.
It's the litigious world I live in.  Sheesh.   >:(

"What can do that to a man?  Lightning... napalm? No, some people just explode [sic]. Natural causes".  Source: Repo Man.


Sgarre1

  • Editor
  • *****
  • Posts: 1211
  • "Let There Be Fright!"
Reply #30 on: December 21, 2014, 08:50:59 PM
Pseudopod *chose* to add the warning, as a peremptory action - it's a "meeting halfway gesture" intended in the spirit of living in a shared community but still honoring freedom of choice and personal responsibility in the listenership.  Horror means different things to different people. No one threatened or forced us.



TrishEM

  • Matross
  • ****
  • Posts: 189
Reply #31 on: December 22, 2014, 12:31:49 AM
I've been enjoying the shorter general warnings at the top of the podcasts lately, especially the variety, as in #417:
Dr. Harcourt shivered. So, what you're saying is this is a horror podcast. My God! There could be adult language and situations inside!
They're like super-short stories to get the listener into the horror mood as the podcast begins. I love the tone. If you can keep up the varying openers, great; if they're too time-consuming, though, that's understandable. In general, I think they work fine as general warnings.