So, when it comes to hard SF (and Science Fiction in general) my favorite novels have been the "Mars" trilogy by Kim Stanley Robinson. Now, I tend to cringe when intellectual work is translated to the screen so I'm cautiously optimistic about this.
http://www.marsnews.com/archives/2008/10/03/amc_mines_red_mars_for_new_scifi_series.htmlYou see, originally it was going to be a MiniSeries on the Sci-Fi Channel ... two or three years ago. That fell apart. Given how Ursula K. LeGuinn's work has fared on that network, perhaps this was for the best.
But now I'm looking at it this way: AMC has a good reputation. Sadly, writer-director Jonathan Hensleigh (
Armageddon) does not.
Doing "Red Mars" -the singular novel- as a series is a good idea if you are going to try to give justice to the full scope of events that take place in that highly dense novel. You could probably get 3-4 seasons out of the first novel in the series, alone! But I'm still not sure if this would be good.
I'm keeping my fingers crossed.
Anyone else have any thoughts on this?
(Oh, and -also- AMC's production of "The Prisoner" with Sir Ian McKellan as Number Two is in the works for release as a mini-series early in 2009; THAT sounds promising!)
Yours,
Sylvan (Dave)