I was ready to dislike this story. When I heard that it was by the same author as "Bleaker Collegiate Presents," I steeled myself. Not because that one was a bad story per se, but it seemed not to actually, you know, be in the fantasy genre. It reminded me of an old bartending joke about how a proper dry martini has merely been struck by a beam of sunlight passing through a bottle of vermouth. "Bleaker Collegiate Presents" had felt a ray of fantasy across its surface, but no more. So I prepared myself. And it didn't do anything to help the situation when it appeared that the two main characters were, once again, young women, possibly in love, discovering themselves, and the pangs, OH the pangs, etc.
But you know what? As it unfolded I started to realize that it was beautiful. Cast in the grandiose light that seems to color all things in adolescence, the emotions rang true and the narrator's world enveloped me. There surely was a time when we all felt our kisses were as vast and intricate as icebergs, our true names written books of grand destinies. So this was good.
Here is the thing though: I don't actually think this is fantasy either. Even less so than "Bleaker." I don't think The Queen is real. Not the Queen, not the bargain, not the hundred years under the hill, none of it. It's all in her imagination. Which is what is so great about this: it's not a fantasy, it's a meta-fantasy. "Nightfall in the Scent Garden" is a story about someone's imagination. Unrequited love, yeah, sure, fine, I've had it, you've had it, I've read about it, you've read about it, that's great. But here we have an imagination story, a narrative fantasy entwined with a life, that evolves along with that life. And our narrator lets someone else into that fantasy, cracks the door of her mind to her, a little. This connection, brief and bright, is the source of the love and its undoing the source of the trauma. And the narrator's daydream saga, as real to her as "real person" Eric and the "world in which you live," is what elevates this story, for me.
So, that's all. I can see why people wouldn't like it. And maybe that's the curse of these hyper-emotional, plotless poetics: if they resonate at your frequency, which this one did for me, you are swept away. If not, you don't see what all the trouble is about.