Hey, all -- N. K. Jemisin here, the story's author. Was going to stay silent and just watch from the sidelines on this one, but I guess I'd better clear a couple of things up.
For those who see this story as an endorsement of child porn... Well, I guess it could be read that way if you squint and tilt your head sideways. But I would've just let the smith rape Anrin if that was the case, and I would've just eroticized that rape. And I would have made Anrin specifically a child, rather than old enough to marry in his society as I noted early on in the story. In medieval Europe, boys generally married (if they had the money and status to marry) around age 17 or 18.
For those who would rather have seen this story done with a female protagonist so that the sex could be het -- just note, I probably would have had to make her 12 or 13, the usual age of marriage for girls in that era. It wouldn't be realistic for a girl in her position to have reached 17 untouched. But if that's your preference, there are actually quite a few Red Riding Hood stories out there which place a female protagonist in a sexual victim's role. Red Riding Hood itself can be read that way; there are literally dozens of versions of this tale, and not all of them treat the sexuality in a symbolic/allegorical manner. For example, I read a version in which she had to buy the woodcutter's help to save her grandmother, using the only currency she had.
Double standards re gender roles is one of the reasons I went the direction I did with this story. (How interesting that so many people have fixed on the mention of slash in the intro, but not the mention of deconstruction!)
Anyway, for more explorations of this myth in heterosexual directions: in addition to the Sondheim musical mentioned in the intro, the cult classic movie "A Company of Wolves" plays more explicitly with this concept (though the female protag is probably about Anrin's age, not the more usual 12). It's also not porn, but still pretty blatantly sexual, hairy-palmed men and all. For literary takes on the concept, I'd recommend
Snow White, Blood Red, an anthology edited by Datlow and Windling from about 10 years ago
http://www.amazon.com/Snow-White-Blood-Ellen-Datlow/dp/0380718758. They did several "adult reworkings of fairy tales" anths, as I recall, but this is the one I read. Not just the RRH myth in that one, but they take on a number of the classic fairy tales and the not-so-hidden dark sexuality of their original, unsanitized/unmodernized forms. (I remember them noting one early version of Sleeping Beauty that featured her waking to the suckling of her infant child, not the prince's kiss -- the prince had already been there, raped her in her sleep, and was long gone.)
For those who'd like to see other homoerotic takes on wolf mythology (though not Red Riding-Hood in this case), there's a German film called "The Wolves of Kromer" (sp? Maybe Kroemer) that does an interesting depiction.
Oh, almost forgot; a few more clarifications. a) Anrin was not raped by the wolf. I'm not sure why people are referring to this as rape; I tried to draw a pretty clear concept between what the smith tried to force (rape) and what Anrin chose (not rape). b) The wolf was in human form during the sex scene. (Wolves can't have sex in the missionary position as far as I know.) And c) The sex also had nothing to do with dominance/submission. There are a number of species in which we've observed homosexual pairbonds in nature; it's rare but it happens. Wolves, who mate for life, are one of these species.
I tend to believe that a story speaks for itself; a writer should never "explain" her work, because if she has to do that then she didn't do a good job of writing it in the first place. But I'm seeing some misconceptions here that don't make sense, and I'm not sure whether that's my fault or something else is going on, so I hope this clears things up for everyone.