The candidates (http://webnews.sff.net/read?cmd=blogview&group=sff.sfwa.electionblog&from=3) are discussing whether the Nebulas do more good or ill for the organization. Neither Scalzi nor Capobianco seems to like them much.
Discussion... fascinating... can't keep eyes... off trainwreck...
Heh. Agreed, and thanks for pointing that out to me. (I gave up my SFF.Net membership a couple years ago, just because I didn't have time to keep my newsgroup active and it wasn't doing much for me besides that. It was fun for several years, though.)
I only read the first ten pages or so. It confirms my belief that John Scalzi is one of the smartest people in the industry right now. But as I'm one of those people who probably
could get SFWA membership from my short fiction credentials, but haven't bothered, I don't really have a stake in this. If some change comes about because of all this, maybe I'll rethink that.
As for the awards... Escape Pod will once again be making offers on the Hugo candidates this year. I believe this does some good for science fiction, to put these stories in front of people and to help bring awareness to Worldcon and the World Science Fiction Society.
Running the Nebula candidates would do less good for science fiction, because both the voting population and the organization behind it are smaller and of less direct relevance to science fiction fans, most of whom aren't writers. I'm not suggesting that the Nebula isn't an achievement, I think it is, but promoting it just isn't as useful.