For anyone who isn't sick of the "overcoming programming" discussion:
Consider the human brain. Compared to many other animals, the human brain has very few inborn instincts, along with some reflexes. Pretty much everything else has to be taught painstakingly. We start with no knowledge whatsoever, only those few instincts and reflexes, along with sensory inputs and the wetware to learn how to interpret them. For me, the brain is analogous to the programming, it's the system that we use to take that sensory input and create a meaningful world out of it. Everyone's is somewhat different, but also basically the same.
A human is not born knowing how to play the piano, nor does a newborn understand the concept of a piano, or even the concept of music or fine motor control. Many adults don't even know how to play the piano (including me). It's something you have to learn to do, but I would say that most CAN learn to do it to some basic level of skill, if they were trained. If someone learns to play the piano, does it mean that they have "overcome their brain" to learn to do so? Not really. Although their brain does not come hardwired with the ability to play piano, the brain is versatile enough to be used in that way. So it's not that the person overcame their brain, it's that their brain allows them to perform a variety of actions that are not hardwired, and this is one of those.
The same goes for programming. Moz's programming was not hardwired to make him behave as he did, but his programming was written in a way to allow a great deal of flexibility of learning and interpretation. So he is making good use of a versatile program, not overcoming his programming.