They SAY it should last longer, but mine doesn't last longer when it's not running. Running it constantly is fine, but not when it's paused and turned off.
Sorry, I'm having trouble parsing that. Last longer than what? Are you saying your iPod's batteries run down faster when you're not using it?
If so, that's...different.
I took that to mean that it lasts longer than the standard ipod battery when it's running continuously, but it lasts the same time as a standard ipod battery when it's turned off. That kind of makes sense, because it has to hold more charge, which is tougher for a battery.
The best analogy I can come up with is it's like a helium balloon: a bigger balloon isn't going to last longer when it's all closed up because the surface area has to be bigger (the helium will leak through the balloon and the more surface area the faster the leak), but if you just open the nozzle (assuming they're the same size nozzle) the large helium balloon should take longer to deflate.
I don't think I got enough sleep last night because that barely made sense to me....
I understood it.
Yeah, though, it is weird.
The iPod itself is a refurb, and my brother-in-law-in-law said Mac has a TERRIBLE reputation with their refurbs.
Next time I'm probably going to get a Creative, or if RIM has a Blackberry that's a true music player plus business app running phone, I'd shell out $400 plus a contract for that. I think we're at a point where businesspeople want a single, handheld device that plays music, lets them surf the web and check email, etc... like an iPhone but minus the suck factor of all the stuff it doesn't do.
I have to ask AT&T if they'd sell me a sim card for the OpenMoko. (
http://openmoko.com/) It does everything the iPhone SHOULD have done, apparently. If anyone gets one, let me know how it is, because it looks pretty ideal except for the touch screen. (I don't like touch screens.)