I utterly fail to understand why so many Americans seem to have such a visceral negative reaction to a measure that would reduce costs and increase their take-home pay, just because it would also benefit people who aren't them.
I sat here and typed (and erased) several replies to this. They ranged from shocked to outraged to insulting. None of them are appropriate or accurate.
I am trying to find the words to convey my thoughts and emotions, but they all sound hollow.
I must have given the impression that this is all about money. It is not. The issue, to me, is not whether or not those less fortunate than myself deserve help. The root of my argument is that it is not the government's job.
By allowing the government to fill this role, fraud, waste, complacency and isolation from the community are created. I see no good in a system that encourages these traits. However, when neighbors or organizations, be they religious or not, take on these tasks, the sum is greater than the parts.
Fraud is created when otherwise honest people hide their assets to receive benefits. An elderly couple that gives their belongings to their children outside of the legal boundaries is committing fraud. Why would they do this? To get the government to pay for a medicaid nursing home. I have seen the varying quality of homes, and I want to be in a nice one if I need one.
The inspector in PD Molly is a prime example of waste. Even if he was a salaried government employee, the existence of his job detracts from the program. When assets are diverted to battle fraud, everyone loses.
Compacency develops when there is no accountability. Why would a person leave their couch to look for opportunities if all of their needs were met? When it's a local organization is helping, they can see the results of their efforts. As a personal example, I have a 36 year old musician friend. I recently gave him some money for insurance and license plates. I wanted to give him more, but it would not have been good for him.
Finally, community isolation devastates any society. News stories abound of people that didn't get involved. Want a good example, listen to the song Alyssa Lies by Jason Michael Carroll. When a people expect the government to look out for the less fortuneate, the responsibility of an individual to help another is removed.
I do not believe in abandoning people. I help where I can. I am not going to give an addict money. Food, clothing, shelter, a hand up? Yes. A beauracracy would either ignore or hurt this peson by giving the wrong "aid".
At some point in your life, you must leave the nest. I would rather see people soar than peck at crumbs.