I'm somewhat mystified by those who say that the movie would have worked better without the crazy psycho guy. Ladies and gents, if you remove the crazy psycho guy from the equation,
the whole rest of the story doesn't happen. Icarus I's mission doesn't fail, the accidents and sabotage on board Icarus II don't happen, the mission succeeds and no one has to make the ultimate sacrifice. Without the crazy psycho guy there's nothing left to drive the plot.
Was it wise to hang an entire plot on that character? I'm undecided. But the idea that someone could look into the face of the sun's raw power and lose himself in it is set up from the very beginning of the film. It's sort of a reverse Nietzsche scenario, with the Light taking the place of the Abyss. I didn't find it unreasonable that someone confronted with the reality and proximity of that power could become unhinged by it, and the heroic efforts of the last two crew members to complete their mission were inspiring in their desperate, dogged determination.
On the whole, I thought it was a beautiful film. Not a happy film at all, but a beautiful one, and I had no complaints with the artistry of it.
And hey, it's an indie film. If you went into it
not expecting everyone to die horrible, miserable deaths, you obviously haven't seen enough indie films.