I would disagree. You can (almost) always land a plane when it is out of fuel, especially a WWII era propeller driven aircraft. "The Cold Equations" relies on just that, the unalterable physical, scientific laws determining the speed, tajectory and distance travelled for a space craft of that type.
it relies on a situation where she must die for the mission to succeed.
it's just a matter of coming up with the right circumstances. how about an arctic radar station on a small rock that needs to be repaired? heavy seas, the plane needs to get there in time and the pilot needs to parachute in order to get on the island. no time to change course, etc. keep in mind, it isn't that the starship couldn't get her to the next port, it's that it couldn't do it and succeed at its mission.
even then, the case they make is a little shaky. they're on a ship with closet doors, clipboards, and presumably weapons. they can't scrounge up a hundred pounds to jettison? it isn't so much that the scenario created is airtight, we need to accept the dilemma is as presented to us.
in this way every single thing that happens in the story can still happen in the new setting. the only real difference is that the pilot jumps to safety (presumably with some essential piece of equipment that only he knows how to use) while she has to stay on the plane, carried to certain death.
While you make some good points, the story isn't that someone has to die for the mission to succeed. That plot could be done with any genre. What makes "The Cold Equations" special is the
reason why someone has to die. The stowaway has to die because she exceeds the maximum mass for the ship to succeed in the mission. I suppose you could substitute another craft for the spaceship, but the story's reliance on the scientific priciples as the cause for the problem places it squarely in
science fiction, rather than fantasy. If you could replace the science with something else, well, then it wouldn't be science fiction.
According to the hard S/F anthology it is reprinted in, Campbell kept rejecting the story until Godwin managed to rewrite it in such a way that Campbell couldn't find some way of saving the girl. It has been a year or so since I last re-read the story so I am shakey on the particulars of the ship itself, but I would imagine that Campbell would have found clipboards and closet doors to eject.
Also, it is not so much the setting that is the issue. You can have science fiction that occurs in contemporary times as well as the future. You premise about an arctic radar station on a small rock would be just as appropriate for science fiction as for a spy story. If the reason the extra person has to die is because of unalterable laws of physics, and that these laws are the crux of the plot, then it is (in my book anyway) still science fiction. If you can come up with exactly the same plot where the unalterable laws of magic say the person has to die, then that would be a fantasy story, and that would prove me wrong. I don't think you can without
completely changing what the story is.
« Last Edit: July 04, 2008, 07:43:28 PM by errant371 »
What part of 'Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn' didn't you understand?