Read "Brilliant: A History of Artificial Light," which was interesting, although it sagged a bit at the end. (More science! Less armchair politics without specific actionable goals!) Also read "Click," which, really, those same guys did "Nudge" and probably "Wink" or "Jump" or some crap. Pop socio-psych without a lick of data or decent studies to back up the vaguely self-help-esque assertions. I'm going to avoid them in the future because I just can't take unsourced science anymore.
Read "Elemental," which was a collection of short stories sold to benefit the 2004 tsunami victims, and it was about fifty/fifty in terms of quality. There were a couple of really good stories and a couple of "Holy crap, really?" of which probably the worst offender was the story some psycho lady wrote about her writing critique group in which she complains about how they don't "get" genre fiction and then has a magic alien named Ne'il Gai'man show them all the mysteries of genre. She apparently shared this with said writing group and was surprised when it went over poorly. I just I don't even what?
Also read "Dracula's Guest," which was actual Victorian-era vampire stories. Probably about 30% good, 40% outdated, and 30% crap, which isn't bad for your average anthology anyway.
Started reading "Dragonforge," the sequel to "Bitterwood," in the hopes that it got better. After thirty pages of wooden dialogue, stiff characterization, and silly plot twists, I gave up again. Once more, the actual opening chapter was nice and strong and if it had just maintained that for the rest of the book it would have been lovely, but no.